The community is invited to attend a Neighborhood Meeting to discuss the pros and cons of incorporation the Millcreek Township. Tuesday, May 15th, 7-9 pm Churchill Junior High 3450 East Oakview Drive (4275 S) Attendees will hear one speaker discuss issues in favor of incorporation and one speaker discuss issues against incorporation. A Q&A session [...]
Call for Volunteers!
With the passage of HB502, our hurdles have changed. To bring incorporation to a vote, we need (as this new law requires) at least 10% of all registered voters in 90% of the Millcreek Township area precincts — so 46 precincts in all. We are coming along on that goal but have a LONG WAYS [...]
Governer Herbert Signs HB502 6th Sub
From Anna Clare Shepherd We have learned that the Governor signed HB 502 6th Sub on Fri., March 23! So it will become law on May 8. That is terrific news! Thank you once again for the part you played in getting this invaluable legislation passed and signed by the Governor! I have been told [...]
HB502 Passes in the Utah House of Representatives
House Bill 502 Incorporation Amendments passed the Utah House of Representatives today with a vote of 48 to 25 with 2 absences or non votes. The legislation now moves to the Senate for consideration on March 7th. You can follow all the activity of the Utah State Legislature here.
Community Meeting – Tuesday, May 15th
The community is invited to attend a Neighborhood Meeting to discuss the pros and cons of incorporation the Millcreek Township.
Tuesday, May 15th, 7-9 pm
Churchill Junior High 3450 East Oakview Drive (4275 S)
Attendees will hear one speaker discuss issues in favor of incorporation and one speaker discuss issues against incorporation.
A Q&A session will following the presentations
Residents will then be able to meet in small groups to discuss the information.
Take advantage of this night to gather important facts on incorporation.
Call for Volunteers!
With the passage of HB502, our hurdles have changed.
To bring incorporation to a vote, we need (as this new law requires) at least 10% of all registered voters in 90% of the Millcreek Township area precincts — so 46 precincts in all. We are coming along on that goal but have a LONG WAYS TO GO in order to meet the deadline: June 2, 2012.
If you would be willing to help us, please contact Anna Clare Shepherd. Even a couple of hours one evening or one Saturday morning will make a HUGE difference in the long run. And we will have someone train you and help you begin, so you’ll have the confidence to accomplish the task.
Together we can make voting on becoming a city a reality for our community. Remember, people can vote “yes” or “no” at the polls. But unless we obtain the required number of signatures, we simply have no vote: not voice and no choice; that option will be barred from us.
To volunteer, Contact Anna Clare Shepherd at (801) 277-4579
Governer Herbert Signs HB502 6th Sub
From Anna Clare Shepherd
We have learned that the Governor signed HB 502 6th Sub on Fri., March 23! So it will become law on May 8. That is terrific news!
Thank you once again for the part you played in getting this invaluable legislation passed and signed by the Governor! I have been told that MANY of you emailed your support and made a significant difference in the positive outcome that resulted. Kudos to every one of you! Let’s always remember that when many of us work together, we can accomplish great things!
Now the petitioning campaign is to obtain signatures of registered voters (rather than property owners, as before) in order to bring incorporation — becoming our own city — to a vote of Millcreek area residents.
Thanks for all your help!
Anna Clare Shepherd
P.S. If you would like to become more actively involved — on our Future of Millcreek Association committee — please let me know that, too. We would love your support and your help in creating the vision and expertise we need for this campaign as we move forward!
HB502 Passes in the Utah House of Representatives
House Bill 502 Incorporation Amendments passed the Utah House of Representatives today with a vote of 48 to 25 with 2 absences or non votes. The legislation now moves to the Senate for consideration on March 7th.
You can follow all the activity of the Utah State Legislature here.
Why Millcreek Township Needs HB502
Our neighbor, Mary Ann Strong, explains why passing HB502 is vital to the future of Millcreek.
HB 502
- The Millcreek Township has 64,000 people
- Current statute requires the signatures of owners of 33% of acreage and property value for the petition to come to a vote on incorporation.
- 35% of the township voted at the last election
- It is not reasonable to require 33% of the signatures when only 35% voted. It’s like requiring almost 100% of the votes to even get it on the ballot.
- Without lowering the signature threshold, it effectively silences us – We have no vote.
- Volunteers have spent 1,000’s of hours getting signatures and working for a vote, but we can’t get enough – 64,000 people. It’s an onerous burden.
- Vote yes on HB 502 to give Millcreek Township a vote and a voice.
What Do the Incorporation Feasibility Study Results Mean?
WHAT DO THE INCORPORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY RESULTS MEAN?
To incorporate is to create our own city within Salt Lake County, rather than remain part of unincorporated County. The proposed name of the city is The City of Millcreek, to match the name of our township, all of which is included in the boundaries of the proposed new city. An outstanding team of consultants has determined through their research that a City of Millcreek would be feasible.
Feasibility, in dollars and cents terms, means the revenues generated in our new city will be equal to our expenses. That is terrific news: even in these difficult recessionary times, we can balance our budget!
What is the next step, now that we have learned a city would be feasible?
By state statute, petitioners for incorporation have 18 months to collect the signatures of about 5,000 more property owners, in order to allow a vote by township residents. If those signatures are certified by the county assessor’s office to be accurate and complete, then we will go to the polls to vote on whether or not we want to become a city. Public hearings will be held to discuss the forms of government and their pros and cons so that residents may make informed decisions.
How many layers of government?
Some have worried that this means we would be paying for duplicate governments. However, it actually just shifts municipal expenses you are already paying for from one layer to the other. Only one government will be paid to administer them. You will still receive only one property tax bill. When you pay that to Salt Lake County, the county will keep the money required to pay the school district, water district, and for mosquito abatement, libraries, county administrators, surveyors, DA, sheriff, health and safety services, and the like. The only line item that will change/be affected by incorporation will be the municipal (local) services fund. This includes things like garbage collection, roads, sidewalks, and so forth.
The new city government will administer municipal services instead of the county government, and the feasibility study has indicated that our revenues will be sufficient to meet the expenses of administering and providing those services. From the start, city leaders will continue to contract with the county for those services, but the contract will make county providers accountable to the city.
City leaders, with input from us residents, will determine which local roads will be done on which schedule, for example, rather than the county making those decisions based on county-wide needs. The city leaders will do as you and I do with our family budgets: Decide what we can afford to do this year or put off until the next year in order to keep that budget balanced and not raise taxes on their neighbors. And if, down the road, city leaders want to look at bidding out some services to private providers who may give us a better deal than the county, they may do so. Other cities have found that to be smart money management and have received excellent service in return. Furthermore, city leaders will have the opportunity to apply for grants and to develop our local economy so as to increase our revenues.
Who are these city leaders?
The legislature has specified the choices of forms of government for cities and towns to include 3 options:
1) a council-mayor government
2) a 5-member council
3) a 6-member council
The council would be elected to represent the population across our township so that there is fair representation from each area. We have the talent and interest within our township to have very competent leaders, as evidenced by the local community councils. The form of government will be voted upon in the same election in which we vote on becoming a city. If a majority of residents vote in favor of incorporation, then there will be another election to vote for our representatives to that new city’s government. We are confident that capable people will step forward and indicate an interest in serving.
How will our municipal taxes compare with what we have been paying as residents of unincorporated county?
According to the county tax rates for 2009 and 2010, our tax rates generally should go down if we incorporate. Our current tax rates for municipal services are higher than those of nearby cities Holladay, Cottonwood Heights, and Sandy, where our homes would likely have comparable value.
What will be the start-up costs?
Some have wondered about how much starting a new government will cost. In recent incorporations, expenses have amounted to about $300,000 initially, rising to over $2 million in the first year. However, also in those recent incorporations, the county council has given back to the new city the portion its residents had been paying in to municipal funds and capital improvements, and it has been sufficient to cover those start-up costs. Inasmuch as our county councilors and mayor have said they support self-determination and are neutral on incorporation, we trust they will support our new city in a manner similar to what has been done in the past. Let us as citizens make that respectful request of them.
What will happen if we don’t obtain enough signatures to put the incorporation initiative on a ballot?
For the next 18 months (until the end of January, 2013), our boundaries are frozen by virtue of the continuing petition drive, according to state statute. If we do not collect property owners’ signatures equal to 1/3 the land acreage and 1/3 the taxable value of the whole township, and have them certified within this brief window of time, we will not have the opportunity to vote on our future form of governance. At the expiration of those 18 months, our boundaries are vulnerable to annexation efforts from surrounding cities, such as Salt Lake City, South Salt Lake, and Holladay, all of which have expressed interest in annexing the township (or parts of it) to their cities. Legislation in 2010 (SB73) removed the border protection we previously had. We may never have the opportunity again for self-determination as a community.
Now, hopefully that has been helpful. The future lies in the hands of yourselves, the property owners.
What are the advantages of becoming our own city?
Primarily, it’s about self-determination. Millcreek Township is an area of great talent, prosperity, and potential. It is a mature area and has the right to represent itself on equal footing at the same table as the other cities in this valley and state do. There is great opportunity for further economic development of this area, particularly within the Millcreek community (west half of the township). The revenues generated by that development will stay here and service the 63,000 residents of the new city. And residents will determine how they want the city to be zoned rather than have such decisions made by those who do not live within our neighborhoods or boundaries.
How can you help?
It is a daunting task to collect the signatures of some 5,000 more property owners, especially within a mere 18 months. These are not individual voters’ signatures; they are individual properties. We depend upon volunteers, exclusively, to petition their neighbors, business associates, and friends who own property within the township.
If you are willing to help, please sign up to be a volunteer. You may consider petitioning door-to-door, holding neighborhood meetings at your home, making phone calls, handing out flyers, donating money or in-kind services to help publicize and pay for paper and printing, etc., or lending your technological expertise. Please understand that none of the current sponsors or petitioners is paid. We donate our time and resources because we believe in this cause; we believe we can succeed as a city and be happier through self-government.
Salt Lake County Budget Troubles
The from the Salt Lake Tribune
Salt Lake County staring at $17 million budget hole
By Jeremiah Stettler, The Salt Lake Tribune
First published Aug 15 2011 06:17PM — [Published in Tribune on Aug. 17, 2011]
Updated Aug 16, 2011 03:44PM
Two months ago, Salt Lake County was talking about higher pay for government workers to mark its slow, but continued, recovery from the Great Recession.
But that conversation now has turned to a multimillion-dollar shortfall that could mean higher taxes, slashed spending or a bit of both to balance the 2012 budget.
The size of the anticipated deficit: $17 million.
Two-term Mayor Peter Corroon confirmed Monday that he plans to meet with the County Council’s Republican majority to talk about taxes — and about what it would take to keep the county government healthy without raising them. The Democrat doubts there is much left in the ledger to cut.
“We have pulled all the rabbits out of the hat,” Corroon warned. “If we put our arm in that hat again, there will be a reduction in service.”
The financial troubles represent an abrupt turnaround from earlier this summer, when the Mayor’s Office recommended a 1 percent pay bump for the 3,500-plus county employees to restore wages, in part, to pre-recession levels. County leaders cut that pay by 2.75 percent at the height of the recession.
Even Corroon backed away from that recommendation when revenue projections — on cash streams ranging from property taxes to motor-vehicle fees — revealed the county was far behind where financial experts expected it to be.
Instead of a raise, a divided council gave employees a one-time bonus.
What makes the latest shortfall particularly painful are the years that preceded it. When the economy tanked, the county trimmed tens of millions of dollars from its budget. Officials did boost property taxes, but they also downsized the workforce, pared employee pay and squeezed departmental budgets.
Consequently, Chief Financial Officer Darrin Casper said the county may have a hard time absorbing the funding gap.
“I’m fearful,” he said, “that it may have an impact on service levels.”
But a tax hike in 2012 could be a hard sell — especially in an election year for a number of county officeholders.
Council Republicans are against it.
“I would not be in favor of any tax increase, unless all other alternatives were scrutinized and looked at intensively,” GOP Councilman Steve DeBry said. “It would be the very last resort. And even then, I’m not sure I’d be in favor of it.”
Democrats are wary, too.
“We are just going to have to do things we haven’t done before,” Democratic Councilman Randy Horiuchi said. “We are down to the short strokes. We have some serious work to do.”
Horiuchi characterized the nine-member council — including the four Democrats — as “not interested in raising taxes.”
But Corroon, who is not seeking a third term next year, argued Monday that the council could face some difficult choices if a tax bump isn’t on the table. The shortfall represents 6 percent of the funding for basic government services.
“At some point, you still have to provide the services the public expects,” he said. “You still have to plow the streets, open rec centers and libraries and cut the grass in the parks.”
The shortfall does not affect the county’s municipal services fund, which pays for city-like services in unincorporated areas. That account, Corroon said, is healthy. It’s the county’s general fund that’s hurting.
Council Chairman Max Burdick, a Republican, said the county’s financial pickle is “much larger” than the latest budget troubles. He said it is time to talk about money — about a deferred maintenance tab now estimated at $80 million to $100 million, about voting machines that may need to be replaced at a cost of $10 million to $15 million and about a hodgepodge of other issues ranging from the installation of computer software to building construction.
“Before we entertain any kind of tax increase,” he said, “let’s put everything on the table and see what our needs are.”
Democratic Councilwoman Jani Iwamoto wants one other thing on the table: An explanation about what happened and why. She urged the reinstatement of a joint budget committee — consisting of representatives from the council and the Mayor’s Office — to examine financial solutions.
“This is kind of a shock to me,” she said. “I would like to see what has really happened, why we are in this situation and where we go from here.”
Could the budget blues brighten before December, when the council is expected to approve a 2012 spending plan?
Corroon hopes so.
“We are still in August,” he said. “At this point, we are going to plan for the worst-case scenario, even though things might turn out for the better.”
Twitter: Stettler_Trib
Feasibility Study PDF
From Salt Lake County
The firm of Lewis, Young, Robertson & Burningham, completed the feasibility study (9MB PDF). The County Council heard their report and voted to accept the study’s findings on June 7th. Public hearings to present the study and gather feedback were held July 19 and August 2. A public informational meeting was held on June 27th, during which different groups presented information about the incorporation process and the study.
Background
Salt Lake County recently received a petition to begin the incorporation feasibility study process for the Millcreek Township, including the communities of Canyon Rim, East Mill Creek, Millcreek, and Mt. Olympus. The petition was certified on January 7 and sets in motion an extensive process of public involvement to allow the landowners and voters in the Millcreek Township determine the future of governance for their community.
Millcreek: Township to City
Anna Clare Shepherd shares her thoughts on the feasibility study and the process to becoming a city.
Read the full article here via Salt Lake Tribune
After publication of this article, the Salt Lake County Auditor’s office revised their projections on Aug 2, 2011. The updated Revenues to Expenditures ratio: 100% for the 1st Year and up to 102% by Year 5.
Consulting Firm Chosen to Complete Feasibility Study
Salt Lake County has selected the firm of Lewis Young Robertson & Burningham to complete the required Feasibility Study
Read the Full Article from the Salt Lake Tribune.
